ArchivIA - Archivio istituzionale dell'Universita' di Catania >
Tesi di dottorato >
Area 05 - Scienze biologiche >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Issue Date: ||13-Feb-2012|
|Authors: ||Spampinato, Simona Federica|
|Title: ||Interaction between estrogen receptor and metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 mediates the
dual effect of estrogen in neuroprotection and
|Abstract: ||Estrogen receptors (ER) are known to exert important action in the central nervous system, including neuroprotection. These effects are due to interaction of estrogen with membrane localized receptors that signal through rapid transduction pathways. How membrane ERs initiate rapid signal transduction has not been clarified, but they have been reported to interact with other membrane receptors, including metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR).
The role of estrogen in neuroprotection is not always defined and above all, neuroprotective data provided by preclinical studies have not been confirmed by the use of estrogen in humans: estrogen treatment can in fact be neuroprotective but also responsible for increased neurodegeneration. The dual role ascribed to estrogen, can be observed also with mGluR1 agonists. 3,5-Dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG) behaves both as a neuroprotective and neurodegenerative factor. The aim of this study has been to point out whether the similar behaviour of the estrogen and mGlu1R agonists depends on the interaction between their receptors.
Neuroprotective activity of both drugs was demonstrated in an in vitro model of cortical cultures exposed to beta amyloid (Aâ) toxicity. Pre-treatment with either 17â-estradiol (E2) and DHPG reduced Aâ-induced neuronal death. The neuroprotective effect was due to strict interaction between mGluR1 and ERá, as treatment with the mGluR1 antagonist, JNJ 16259685, or ER antagonist, ICI 182,780, prevented the effect induced by the respective as well as by the reciprocal agonist. Moreover, E2 and DHPG shared a common signalling pathway, as they stimulated to a similar extent phosphoinositide hydrolysis and induced enhanced phosphorylation of AKT. Both these effects were not additive, when the two agonists were added together and they were prevented by the reciprocal antagonists. In addition, a similar effect was reproduced when each receptor was expressed in recombinant cells.
The interaction between the two receptors seems to be involved also in the neurotoxic effect of E2 and DHPG. Both compounds exacerbated NMDA induced toxicity when added after the neurotoxic challenge, while being still neuroprotective when administered before. The effect of E2 was not modified by co-treatment with DHPG and was sensitive to ICI 182,780, but also to JNJ16259685. Moreover, this potentiating effect is abolished by pre-treatment with a calpain III inhibitor. The ability of E2 to phosphorylate AKT and ERK is reduced after NMDA pulse, but this effect is partially reverted by pre-treatment with the calpain inhibitor.
Altogether the present data demonstrate that membrane ERs and mGluR1 interact to induce both neuroprotection and neurodegeneration. The different outcome may depend on the cellular conditions, thus pointing out the importance of the choice of the timing of intervention.|
|Appears in Collections:||Area 05 - Scienze biologiche|
Files in This Item:
|SPMSNF84C54C351O-tesi dottorato.pdf||tesi dottorato||3,02 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open
Items in ArchivIA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.